And about time. The fact that Dawkins would like to suppress any exploration of intelligent design in the classroom is a particularly repulsive example of totalitarian scientism.
Anglican Samizdat
Pages
Top Posts
- According to the Anglican Church of Canada, Jesus was a racist
- Music and Faith
- The right-wing blog conspiracy
- Global warming is actually caused by burping cows
- Michael Jackson the "pop icon"
- Now you can have a life size model of your unborn child
- The John Shelby Spong Delusion
- Islam and homosexuality
- Blackberry Babies
- Dirty and loving it
Recent Comments
- David on New home
- Peter on New home
- David on New home
- Warren on New home
- David on New home
- Warren on New home
- Jim Muirhead on Shut the expletive up
- Kate Sanderson on Looking good
- AMPisAnglican on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
- AMPisAnglican on Shut the expletive up
- Jim Muirhead on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
- David on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
Fanmail:
"I deplore your narrow-mindedness""This whole post and corresponding comments reeks of bigotry, hate, and ignorance. I am disgusted to have come across it."
"something we definitely do not need paraded around the blogosphere."
"you, as an evangelical, need to repent"
"You really should do something about this holier-than-thou iconoclasm. It’s not healthy."
"Is this in any way edifying?"
"You are extremely ignorant, i pray Allah guides you"
"Do you really think blogging your explicit hatred and mean spirited-ness marks you as one of the faith-filled Christians that you claim to be?"
Archives
Blogroll
Blog Stats
- 229,357 hits
Meta
-
-
-
-
-
Join 10 other subscribers
Facebook
Twitter from anglicansam
Tweets by anglicansam
Anglican Samizdat 
The smug athiest just got a cold dose of logic -and he sure didn’t like it.
Peace,
Jim
Comment by Jim Muirhead — October 10, 2009 @ 11:43 am
Of course scientism, and the scientistic establishment, in fascist. It’s all about power and control. The “science” these people represent is about securing dogma, and preventing its questioning (real science, of course, is about questioning consensuses, thinking something new and different – this is what produces progress in the (real) search for knowledge). This scientistic attitude is one reason why (it has been suggested) the growth of human knowledge, in the future, will take place somewhere other than in the West.
Comment by John Thomas — October 13, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
O’Reilly is an idiot….
I guess some people will never understand logic…
Comment by Joeri — October 13, 2009 @ 9:07 pm
And your contribution to understanding logic is: “O’Reilly is an idiot”. Very profound.
Comment by David — October 13, 2009 @ 9:13 pm