Logic from a master, John Lennox:
Anglican Samizdat
Pages
Top Posts
- The compassionate financing of Hamas
- Does the Anglican Church of Canada actually know what the Gospel is?
- Every time a bell rings an Angel inhales CO2
- UK Tory leader competes in the “who has the most gays” contest
- Rev. Alan T Perry should wear a burka
- Primate of Canada, Fred Hiltz is engaged in cross border intervention
- Music and Faith
- Global warming is actually caused by burping cows
- Now you can have a life size model of your unborn child
- The UN: A stage for lunatics
Recent Comments
- David on New home
- Peter on New home
- David on New home
- Warren on New home
- David on New home
- Warren on New home
- Jim Muirhead on Shut the expletive up
- Kate Sanderson on Looking good
- AMPisAnglican on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
- AMPisAnglican on Shut the expletive up
- Jim Muirhead on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
- David on A message from the alternate universe of Bishop Michael Ingham
Fanmail:
"I deplore your narrow-mindedness""This whole post and corresponding comments reeks of bigotry, hate, and ignorance. I am disgusted to have come across it."
"something we definitely do not need paraded around the blogosphere."
"you, as an evangelical, need to repent"
"You really should do something about this holier-than-thou iconoclasm. It’s not healthy."
"Is this in any way edifying?"
"You are extremely ignorant, i pray Allah guides you"
"Do you really think blogging your explicit hatred and mean spirited-ness marks you as one of the faith-filled Christians that you claim to be?"
Archives
Blogroll
Blog Stats
- 229,347 hits
Meta
-
-
-
-
-
Join 10 other subscribers
Facebook
Twitter from anglicansam
Tweets by anglicansam
Anglican Samizdat 
Dawkins is deluded in sillyness of the suggestion that God had a beginning because he did. Just because a chicken is hatched does not mean that all creatures are hatched, especially if the species is different, and especially when this being is the author of all. In this, I think that the application logic (if there is any) is totally and entirely misconceived. His condescension of faith, Christ and the ultimate sacrifice paid, reveals his concern and uneasiness about eternity. For if a man knows something to be true, he is sure by it’s knowingness. But, Dawkins is unsure and that is why he seeks to prove or proof of his nonsense Theory.
Comment by Rob Cheshire — January 22, 2010 @ 10:58 pm